Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 04:59

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Thank you.
Vikings Agree to Terms on Josh Oliver Contract Extension - Minnesota Vikings
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What’s next?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
China’s asteroid-and-comet hunter probe unfurls a ‘solar wing’ - theregister.com
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Weird-shaped notebooks make me want to write again - The Verge
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Study Reveals How Much Exercise You Need Each Week to Control Blood Pressure - ScienceAlert
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Defense Department signs OpenAI for $200 million 'frontier AI' pilot project - theregister.com
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?